Already has a rainwater tank
Add monitoring and a controlled outlet, where the existing plumbing permits it. Usually the most interesting software-first retrofit: the storage has already been paid for.
Not every property is suitable, and each installation must be assessed individually. But we don't need every house. By starting where tanks and drainage are already easy to connect, we can learn, demonstrate value, and expand gradually.
Three common starting points, ordered by likely effort—not a guarantee of cost.
Add monitoring and a controlled outlet, where the existing plumbing permits it. Usually the most interesting software-first retrofit: the storage has already been paid for.
Intercept the roof downpipe, add a tank, and reconnect through an approved outlet. Less new piping can make the installation economical—if there's space.
More connected roof area may justify a larger, shared installation. Fixed control and connection costs can be spread over more storage—but roof size alone doesn't guarantee savings.
No tank space, several distant downpipes, hard excavation, difficult sewer connections, roof-access constraints, permits, and unexpected work can make a project costly. It is reasonable to leave those for later.
Vienna announced an approximately €10 million investment in 2019, and the reservoir entered service in 2020. This is a historical project-budget benchmark, not a verified final invoice or an equal-hydraulic-performance comparison. It includes major construction and site-specific infrastructure. Original announcement ↗
Choose the existing infrastructure, tank size, and roof-cooling option. All prices are tentative gross EUR estimates for simple illustrative cases in Austria.
New tank capacity is part of the estimated investment.
Used to estimate collectible rainwater and the extent of roof-wetting equipment—not the cost of underground storage itself.
For an existing tank, set the volume that could realistically be controlled.
Represents site work, access and connections. The difficult category can quickly defeat the low-cost hypothesis.
A tentative extra pump or valve, filter, roof-distribution lines, fittings and labor. This is not a designed or approved roof installation.
Nominal-capacity ratios only. Different scope, year, operating conditions and sewer-system effects.
The cooling option is separate from stormwater storage; no cooling benefit has yet been experimentally calibrated.
80% collection efficiency assumed. This estimates roof runoff captured in available storage, not CSO overflow prevented, tank refill across events, or evaporated water.
These assumptions are editable in the page's JavaScript; they are not installation quotes.
Real values must be established by technical inspection, hydraulic design and installer quotes. To estimate flood benefit, catchment and sewer-capacity data are still missing.
Installed storage is not automatically equivalent to the engineering performance of a municipal storm basin. Existing-tank retrofits enable managed storage rather than new capacity. Tap water consumes potable supply and may cause limescale, especially with hard water. Rooftop wetting requires roof-material compatibility, drainage, access and electrical safety assessments.
We don't need to retrofit an entire city immediately. Start with favorable buildings, learn the true installation costs, confirm safe operating conditions, and expand from evidence—not assumptions.